|
| | Benchmark descriptions |
| | |
|
| This is a new development compared with the TPC-C benchmark that is generally accepted by the industry as database benchmark over the last years. |
|
|
| This benchmark, in which complete OLTP system configurations are measured, is a benchmark that is generally accepted by the industry. |
|
|
| The OLTP-2 benchmark replaces the older OLTP benchmark, which is no longer usable with current system configurations. |
|
|
| Focus of the OLTP benchmark is placed on the scaling and relative performance comparisons within the PRIMERGY server family. |
|
|
| A brief overview of the purpose and functions of the Benchmark NetBench and how NetBench tests are run in the PRIMERGY Performance Lab. |
|
|
| A de-facto standard benchmark that measures the maximum number of supported users in a SAP Sales & Distribution scenario. |
|
|
| This document provides an overview of MAPI Messaging Benchmark (MMB) for Microsoft Exchange Servers. |
|
|
| Today there is no benchmark for virtual environments that is agnostic to product and platform and has a final »release« status. vServCon has been developed at Fujitsu Siemens Computers for internal purposes to fill this gap. |
|
|
| The web server benchmark SPECweb2005 was developed by the Standard Performance Evaluation Corporation and issued in 2005. |
|
|
| This benchmark, in which processor and memory performance are measured, is a benchmark that is generally accepted by the industry. |
|
|
| SPECjbb evaluates the performance of server-site Java by emulation a three-tier client/server system, with emphasis on the middle tier. |
|
| SPECint®, SPECfp®, SPECjbb®, SPECweb® and the SPEC logo are registered trademarks of the Standard Performance Evaluation Corporation (SPEC). For the latest benchmark results, visit http://www.spec.org |
 | | | |
